. @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning protocol in human history. "There is no second best math protocol. There is no second best language." "Once a protocol hits critical mass, there's a massive network effect. And a
Michael Saylor argues that Bitcoin's dominance is due to network effects, not belief, and compares it to other winning protocols like English and Arabic math.
. @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning protocol in human history. "There is no second best math protocol. There is no second best language." "Once a protocol hits critical mass, there's a massive network effect. And a
RT @KevinWSHPod: . @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning pr …
. @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning protocol in human history. "There is no second best math protocol. There is no second best language." "Once a protocol hits critical mass, there's a massive network effect. And a
. @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning protocol in human history. "There is no second best math protocol. There is no second best language." "Once a protocol hits critical mass, there's a massive network effect. And a
RT @KevinWSHPod: . @saylor argues Bitcoin's dominance has nothing to do with belief - it follows the exact same pattern as every winning pr…