QooryBeta
Back to narratives
GovernanceActive
Conversation intelligence

Bitcoin Governance Debate Intensifies Over BIP-110 and OP_CAT Layer

BIP-110, a proposal to temporarily restrict non-monetary data on Bitcoin, has ignited controversy over block space use and spam definitions. Meanwhile, OP_CAT Layer continues to promote programmable Bitcoin and AI-native finance, highlighting the ongoing split in Bitcoin's scaling vision.

Heat
100
Confidence
90%
Evidence
6
Updated

Why It Happened

The proposal aims to curb Ordinals and Runes inscriptions by limiting non-monetary writes, drawing criticism from those who see it as censorship. OP_CAT Layer counters with a vision of Bitcoin as a programmable layer for autonomous agents and DeFi.

Outcome So Far

BIP-110 has lost miner support, with signaling dropping to 0% in recent blocks, suggesting the proposal is unlikely to advance.

Actors

Timeline order

Post
Parent event 01

BIP-110 signaling drops to 0%

User @Relentless_btc reports that BIP-110 signaling has fallen to 0% over the past 124 blocks, indicating lack of miner support.

Related posts@Relentless_btc
@Relentless_btc
Open on X14.8K views · 307 likes · 57 reposts

Post
Parent event 02

X conversation update

1 related posts from @LoveIsBitcoin21

Related posts@LoveIsBitcoin21
@LoveIsBitcoin21
Open on X7.5K views · 26 likes · 0 reposts

Post
Parent event 04

Cryptoast reports on BIP-110 controversy

Cryptoast publishes article stating BIP-110 proposes temporary restrictions on non-monetary data writes in Bitcoin, aiming to reduce Ordinals and Runes inscriptions, sparking debate over Bitcoin governance and spam definition.

Related postsX
X