🚨JUST IN: Michael @Saylor shares 110 reasons why BIP-110 is a bad idea, arguing it violates Bitcoin's neutrality, restricts future innovation, and uses consensus rules where fees and relay policy are better solutions.
Michael Saylor criticizes BIP-110, arguing it violates Bitcoin's neutrality and restricts innovation.
🚨JUST IN: Michael @Saylor shares 110 reasons why BIP-110 is a bad idea, arguing it violates Bitcoin's neutrality, restricts future innovation, and uses consensus rules where fees and relay policy are better solutions.
Saylor Rejects BIP 110, Warns Softfork Threatens Bitcoin's Neutral Rules https://t.co/8s2wOoFuHj
吴说获悉，Strategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 发布长文《110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea》，公开反对限制铭文等数据存储用途的 BIP 110 提案。Saylor 表示，尽管部分铭文、代币或文件可能毫无价值甚至具有欺诈性，但是否应通过修改共识规则来限制其存在是另一回事。Saylor 认为，比特币无法判断数据用途，协议应保持中立，争议性交易应由手续费市场、节点和矿工策略决定，而非通过共识层禁止。他表示：比特币不需要纯洁性的守护者，而需要中立性的守护者。wublock123.com/news/michael-s…
Michael Saylor Opposes BIP 110, Says Bitcoin Needs “Guardians of Neutrality” Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor published an article titled “110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea,” opposing the proposal to restrict certain Bitcoin transaction types through consensus changes. Saylor argued that
Michael Saylor opposes BIP 110, calls for Bitcoin neutrality over transaction filtering
Michael Saylor发文反对BIP 110，强调比特币应保持中立、开放市场与无需许可创新。 Saylor 列出 110 条反对的理由，强调比特币应该在底层保持保守。比特币不需要纯粹性的守护者，它需要的是中立性的守护者。
你支持BIP-110吗？ 给市场除了AI找点BTC的技术存在感 给不知道BIP-110的小伙伴们简单科普一下：BIP-110 是一项比特币改进提案，旨在限制铭文(Ordinals)、NFT 等非金融数据写入区块链，减少区块空间占用，降低手续费和节点运行成本，让比特币更专注于支付和价值存储。 其争议点在于：支持者认为应优先保障货币交易；反对者则认为，只要交易符合共识规则并支付手续费，就不应按用途进行限制，否则会破坏比特币的“中立性(Neutrality)和无需许可(Permissionless)”的核心原则。
7.19 饼子热点信息整理 1⃣：微策略创始人正式反对 BIP-110 微策略创始人 @saylor 发布长文，公开反对 BIP-110。他认为比特币应保持中立，争议交易应交给手续费市场、节点和矿工策略，而不是共识层直接禁止。（大佬正式下场对轰） x.com/saylor/status/… 2⃣：寄生虫矿池挖出第 5 区块 OMB 合集的寄生虫矿池 @Parasite_wtf 发图显示，其再次挖出区块 #958527，这是他们挖出的第五个区块。区块奖励 3.131BTC，挖到的矿工独拿 1 BTC，剩余奖励继续按算力份额分给参与者。（3 天挖到 2 个区块，这几天矿池的算力一下子提高了很
Michael Saylor Opposes BIP 110, Says Bitcoin Needs “Guardians of Neutrality” Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor published an article titled “110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea,” opposing the proposal to restrict certain Bitcoin transaction types through consensus changes. Saylor argued that