In case anyone didn't catch it, this poem is an allegory for Bitcoin dev. The code is open-source so you can just fork it and modify. Core cannot change consensus rules, only policy. You have that same power too. Undo their policy changes in your fork. You can dislike certain Core devs and still fin
A poem is used as an allegory for Bitcoin development, highlighting the open-source nature and ability to fork and modify policy changes.
In case anyone didn't catch it, this poem is an allegory for Bitcoin dev. The code is open-source so you can just fork it and modify. Core cannot change consensus rules, only policy. You have that same power too. Undo their policy changes in your fork. You can dislike certain Core devs and still fin
In case anyone didn't catch it, this poem is an allegory for Bitcoin dev. The code is open-source so you can just fork it and modify. Core cannot change consensus rules, only policy. You have that same power too. Undo their policy changes in your fork. You can dislike certain Core devs and still fin
Agree that it's the crux of a large point of the disagreement. Everything that Core did can be undone in your own node or on a fork of the code, it's just that they are the ref implementation so many will be dragged along with their defaults. The fact remains that their changes are only policy and