The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers can already jailbreak any API or guardrails. Defenders can't secure systems with black boxes they can't control, inspect, test, or run locally.
Open-source AI models are defended as a security advantage, not a risk, because they allow control, inspection, and local testing against attackers who can already bypass any API.
The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers can already jailbreak any API or guardrails. Defenders can't secure systems with black boxes they can't control, inspect, test, or run locally.
The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers can already jailbreak any API or guardrails. Defenders can't secure systems with black boxes they can't control, inspect, test, or run locally. https://t.co/OiQ4sMd2gW
The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers can already jailbreak any API or guardrails. Defenders can't secure systems with black boxes they can't control, inspect, test, or run locally.
RT @ClementDelangue: The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers c…
The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers can already jailbreak any API or guardrails. Defenders can't secure systems with black boxes they can't control, inspect, test, or run locally.
RT @ClementDelangue: The cybersecurity debate on open-source AI is backwards. Open models aren't the risk, they're the defense! Attackers c…