A huge amount of the Anti-AI code sentiment massively overestimates the quality of human code outside of a very small set of open source and high quality company codebases. Human Slop is everywhere and can trivially be improved on by any opus level model.
The article argues that anti-AI code sentiment overestimates human code quality, noting that much human code is sloppy and can be improved by AI models.
A huge amount of the Anti-AI code sentiment massively overestimates the quality of human code outside of a very small set of open source and high quality company codebases. Human Slop is everywhere and can trivially be improved on by any opus level model.
A huge amount of the Anti-AI code sentiment massively overestimates the quality of human code outside of a very small set of open source and high quality company codebases. Human Slop is everywhere and can trivially be improved on by any opus level model.
RT @tobi: A huge amount of the Anti-AI code sentiment massively overestimates the quality of human code outside of a very small set of open…
anti-ai people really underestimate human slop. either they’re the ones creating it, or they’ve been lucky or isolated enough to never be exposed to it. i’ve seen some truly horrible man made codebases that even gpt-3.5 wouldn’t have produced. https://x.com/tobi/status/2077862721563828422
A huge amount of the Anti-AI code sentiment massively overestimates the quality of human code outside of a very small set of open source and high quality company codebases. Human Slop is everywhere and can trivially be improved on by any opus level model.