Regulation by fear, uncertainty, and doubt is arguably worse than regulation by enforcement because it creates a chilling effect without the accountability of formal rulemaking or judicial review. “Regulatory decisions should always be well justified and grounded in facts, logic, and evidence, not
@rachaelrad·Jul 19, 2026·2 sources·neutral
Read articleAI Summary
The article argues that regulation through fear and uncertainty is worse than enforcement-based regulation due to lack of accountability.
All Sources
Regulation by fear, uncertainty, and doubt is arguably worse than regulation by enforcement because it creates a chilling effect without the accountability of formal rulemaking or judicial review. “Regulatory decisions should always be well justified and grounded in facts, logic, and evidence, not
@rachaelrad
Jul 19, 2026
Regulation by fear, uncertainty, and doubt is arguably worse than regulation by enforcement because it creates a chilling effect without the accountability of formal rulemaking or judicial review. Important 👇 “Regulatory decisions should always be well justified and grounded in facts, logic, and
@rachaelrad
Jul 19, 2026