I see many BIP110 supports keep saying they want Bitcoin to be used as money, but no one against BIP110 is disagreeing that Bitcoin is money. Yes, a Core devs have said some obtuse things, but Core is not Bitcoin. Your average Bitcoin HODLer that is against BIP110 also thinks Bitcoin is money.
The article argues that both supporters and opponents of BIP110 agree that Bitcoin is money, distinguishing between Core developers and the broader Bitcoin community.
I see many BIP110 supports keep saying they want Bitcoin to be used as money, but no one against BIP110 is disagreeing that Bitcoin is money. Yes, a Core devs have said some obtuse things, but Core is not Bitcoin. Your average Bitcoin HODLer that is against BIP110 also thinks Bitcoin is money.
I found this thread very helpful to understand the mindset of BIP110 supporters. BIP110 seems to be more of a way for them to express themselves than it is an actual attempt to fork. Most initial reactions were to not answer the question, but rather to express anger and unhappiness with Core. Some
I found this thread very helpful to understand the mindset of BIP110 supporters. BIP110 seems to be more of a way for them to express themselves than it is an actual attempt to fork. Most initial reactions were to not answer the question, but rather to express anger and unhappiness with Core. Some
I found this thread very helpful to understand the mindset of BIP110 supporters. BIP110 seems to be more of a way for them to express themselves than it is an actual attempt to fork. Most initial reactions were to not answer the question, but rather to express anger and unhappiness with Core. Some