Agreed @saylor, Bitcoin has historically remained neutral toward valid, fee-paying transactions, allowing the free market, not individual preferences, to determine which applications create value. That neutrality has enabled continuous innovation without requiring permission from a central authority

Agreed @saylor, Bitcoin has historically remained neutral toward valid, fee-paying transactions, allowing the free market, not individual preferences, to determine which applications create value. That neutrality has enabled continuous innovation without requiring permission from a central authority

This isn't just an Ordinals or Runes debate. It's about whether Bitcoin remains neutral toward every valid, fee-paying transaction. The free market, not preferences, should decide what succeeds. $DOG (Bitcoin) 🟧🐾