If Dean (or @tszzl, @willdepue…) says something consistent with OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hack If Dean says something contrary to OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hypocrite If we want honest takes from lab employees, or indeed any takes at all, this is not the way https://x.com/deanwball/
A commentator argues that criticism of OpenAI employee Dean Ball's statements is inconsistent and discourages honest discourse.
If Dean (or @tszzl, @willdepue…) says something consistent with OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hack If Dean says something contrary to OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hypocrite If we want honest takes from lab employees, or indeed any takes at all, this is not the way https://x.com/deanwball/
If Dean (or @tszzl, @willdepue…) says something consistent with OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hack If Dean says something contrary to OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hypocrite If we want honest takes from lab employees, or indeed any takes at all, this is not the way https://x.com/deanwball/
If Dean (or @tszzl, @willdepue…) says something consistent with OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hack If Dean says something contrary to OpenAI’s interests, he’s called a hypocrite If we want honest takes from lab employees, or indeed any takes at all, this is not the way https://x.com/deanwball/