Saylor gave 110 reasons why BIP 110 is a bad idea. FYI, BIP 110 is a proposed temporary soft fork to limit inscriptions and other data spam on Bitcoin for about a year. It’s pretty divisive and has almost zero miner support so far. Saylor’s main point is that it risks Bitcoin’s neutrality. You fo

Saylor gave 110 reasons why BIP 110 is a bad idea. FYI, BIP 110 is a proposed temporary soft fork to limit inscriptions and other data spam on Bitcoin for about a year. It’s pretty divisive and has almost zero miner support so far. Saylor’s main point is that it risks Bitcoin’s neutrality. You fo

Saylor gave 110 reasons why BIP 110 is a bad idea. FYI, BIP 110 is a proposed temporary soft fork to limit inscriptions and other data spam on Bitcoin for about a year. It’s pretty divisive and has almost zero miner support so far. Saylor’s main point is that it risks Bitcoin’s neutrality. You fo

LATEST: ⚡️ Michael Saylor published an essay outlining 110 arguments against Bitcoin's new BIP 110, arguing "the proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition."

It's kind of obvious that no one wants BIP110 except for a few hundred people on X. It's not about plebs vs big names. The "big names" are just saying BIP110 doesn't make any sense. You can still add data to Bitcoin under the BIP110 rules. Plebs can support anything they want, but it's the economic

Michael Saylor Comes Out Against Bitcoin’s BIP-110, Calling the Anti-Spam Soft Fork ‘a Bad Idea’

BIP110 supporters: You claim Bitcoin is captured by corrupt devs, suitcoiners, spammers, plus "Big Bitcoin," and that only an emergency soft-fork can save it. When BIP110 activates as a minority fork, can you in good conscience keep holding/using BTC after causing so much drama?

BIP110 supporters: You claim Bitcoin is captured by corrupt devs, suitcoiners, spammers, plus "Big Bitcoin," and that only an emergency soft-fork can save it. When BIP110 activates as a minority fork, can you in good conscience keep holding/using BTC after causing so much drama?

BIP110 supporters: You claim Bitcoin is captured by corrupt devs, suitcoiners, spammers, plus "Big Bitcoin," and that only an emergency soft-fork can save it. When BIP110 activates as a minority fork, can you in good conscience keep holding/using BTC after causing so much drama?

Strategy's Michael Saylor Makes 110-Point Case Against Bitcoin's BIP-110

Strategy’s Michael Saylor argues against Bitcoin’s BIP-110 proposal, calling it a ‘bad idea’

🚨 Michael Saylor is coming out swinging against Bitcoin's BIP-110, calling the anti-spam soft fork "a bad idea." His warning: "the proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition." https://unchainedcrypto.com/michael-saylor-comes-out-against-bitcoins-bip-110-calling-the-anti-spam-soft-fork-a-b

Saylor joins Bitcoin’s BIP-110 fight as miners get one last chance to avoid forced signaling

Michael Saylor just published "110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea." Not a typo. 📜 His core argument: "disapproval is not invalidity." A transaction can be wasteful or offensive and still follow the rules, and using consensus changes to police that sets a precedent he calls more dangerous than the s